JUST TAKE A PILL FOR THAT by Judie Brown ALL

It has always been my contention that nobody should take medicine without first reading all of the information and understanding that there is a possibility of unpleasant, or even dangerous, side effects. Of course the opportunity for those deleterious consequences becomes more plausible when you are taking more than one medication. As one wise older gentleman stated, it is always imperative to find out for yourself how one drug interacts with others.

But even if you are taking only a single medical prescription, it is still an absolute necessity to understand your own medical history, be able to share it with your doctor and then make an informed decision about whatever the medicine is that has been prescribed. Most doctors, if quizzed, will eventually give you all the information you need.

Having said that, one has to ask the logical question: What should make birth control pills any different?

Well, there are a couple of things that make that assortment of drugs unique. First, they are part of the medicine chest preferred by those who promote sexual promiscuity and abortion. These folks believe that pregnancy is a disease and the pill is the antidote. Such so-called professionals will go to any length to deny the side effects, bury or discredit the studies and generally deceive the public.

We know from the clinical information published by various pharmaceutical companies that the pill has three modes of action and that one of those is abortion. Abortion is caused by the pill thinning the uterine wall which, in turn, prevents the preborn child from implanting. Thus, the baby dies.

We know that those who market the pill and those who prescribe it or recommend it are people who argue that pregnancy does not begin at the biological beginning of a preborn human individual’s life. They have revised scientific fact to suit their political agenda even though, in truth, no words can actually change biology.

When it was brought to the attention of the National Cancer Institute that the birth control pill can contribute to an increased risk of breast cancer, the Institute denied that this was the case—even going so far as to ignore clinical studies that proved the connection.

In a speech earlier this month, Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., FACS said that it was after much research that a connection was made between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer. She pointed out, incredibly, that this information was known for over 20 years but never explained to women. “But when that knowledge was put in the hands of women who needed and considered it, many acted upon it and breast cancer rates fell.” She then asked her audience, “What do you think will happen when women learn that these same hormones are in oral contraceptives but in much higher doses? Will half of the 75% of premenopausal women in the United States who take hormonal contraceptives stop these hormones like their mothers did after menopause?”

Chris Kahlenborn, M.D., has studied extensively the relationship between breast cancer and the birth control pill. According to Kahlenborn, “If a woman takes the oral contraceptive pill before her FFTP [first full term pregnancy], she suffers a 40% increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to women who do not take OCPs [oral contraceptive pills]. If she takes OCPs for 4 years or more prior to her FFTP, she may have an even higher risk.”

So why isn’t this front page news, particularly during Breast Cancer Awareness Month?

There is no legitimate answer to this question. The fact is that, because the birth control pill is part of Planned Parenthood’s bag of tricks, the topic is off limits. Planned Parenthood’s goal is not to foster respect for the bodies of its clients, but rather to rake in the money by marketing all manner of perversion.

The solution: women must stand up and say they will no longer be human guinea pigs for the culture of death! They must refuse to “just take a pill for that.” After all, pregnancy is natural; dying of cancer or killing one’s baby is tragic.

Oct-15-2010

Suffering Children Should Be Smothered

UK Pundit to Shocked TV Host: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/uk-pundit-to-shocked-tv-host-suffering-children-should-be-smothered/

Suffering Children Should Be Smothered

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 8:17am by
Scott Baker
Advice columnists in Britain are known as “agony aunts” (or uncles). Virginia Ironside is one. Her latest bit of advice has drawn outraged reaction from television viewers who caught her comments on the BBC yesterday. She appeared during a segment called, “Can abortion be a kindness?” Here’s the Daily Mail account of her comments:

Miss Ironside said: ‘If a baby’s going to be born severely disabled or totally unwanted, surely an abortion is the act of a loving mother.’
She added: ‘If I were the mother of a suffering child – I mean a deeply suffering child – I would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face… If it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good mother would.’

Disability rights advocates called her pro-eugenics approach “despicable.” Even the host seemed stunned:

Programme host Susanna Reid appeared visibly shocked by her comments during the live debate, gasping: ‘That’s a pretty horrifying thing to say, that you would put a pillow over a suffering child.’

In the past, Ironside has said she believes doctors should not try to save the lives of “very premature babies.”

Comments (371)
Comments Page 2 →Page 1 of 12
JGP
Posted on October 4, 2010 at 8:25am
How could you be a “loving mother” and at the same time not want your child? The woman has no soul.

MSG

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 9:07am
It’s the mentality of the progressive agenda,,, just look at the violence against children and others in this video:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100056510/go-green-or-well-kill-your-kids-says-richard-curtis-eco-propaganda-shocker/

TruthTalker

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 9:50am
Apparently her own mother disagrees because this woman must have been suffering from mental illness for her entire life.

Report Post » jnword

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 9:51am
This woman most likely had gotten a Rhodes Scholarship… the crimal Cecil Rhodes wiped out Africa for his boss Rothschilds! Clinton another brainwased stooge had a Rhodes Scholarship, like 12 memeber of this current White House..we best wake up soon!

Report Post » CultureWarriors

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 9:54am
This is why I believe many so called liberals are just profoundly ignorant. They hear the compassion that progressives spin but aren’t smart enough to see through that spin. The liberal progressive elites actually believe that abortion is about not letting the poor reproduce while at the same time branding it as a women’s rights issue. They are truly evil and bereft of character. This born out of an overwhelming sense of insecurity. A liberal goes through life thinking deep down inside they aren’t good enough, so how could anyone else be able to take care of themselves? Like I’ve said before, liberalism is a mental disorder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UtmTALMkU4

You don’t measure compassion by many get a hand handout, you measure it by how many don’t need a handout!

Report Post » theninthplanet

Posted on October 4, 2010 at 10:04am
Ironside said aloud what all other eugenics advocates believe. It’s OK though – we’re only talking about the physically and mentally deformed though, not the Jews. Unfortunately these people are unable to make the connection between eugenics and the holocaust.

Report Post » cdavehere
Posted on October 4, 2010 at 10:05am
I think we all need to stop here and deeply think about this. There has to be a point when prolonging life becomes cruel. What if it were you in agony? I find it hard to agree with this woman, but am I being selfish.

Report Post » Satai Delenn
Posted on October 4, 2010 at 10:27am
I can not begin to fathom how someone could be so cold hearted. I watched a movie recently called “Follow the Stars Home” amazing and far closer to how “any good Mother” would feel.

http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/249254/Follow-the-Stars-Home/overview

Being a Mother is not an easy job, it is one of love and patience. Being the Mother of a disabled child is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. We should all remember that life is worth it. Children what ever package they come in are gifts from our Fahter in Heaven. He shares them with us for a short time and we are blessed to be part of the lives He gives us.

Report Post » /